Winners and Losers of TD018: Mercedes, Red Bull, and the Curious Case of F1’s Mid-Season Comeback

The 2025 Formula 1 season has turned into a masterclass in unpredictability. What began as another year of Red Bull dominance and Ferrari resurgence has transformed into a fascinating chess match of innovation and adaptation — with Mercedes suddenly roaring back to life just when it seemed they were done developing the W16. And at the center of it all lies a single document: Technical Directive TD018.

 

 

Mercedes’s Wild Ride: From Struggles to Surge

Few teams have experienced the whiplash Mercedes has in the ground-effect era. After a solid start with five podiums in ten races — capped by a dominant win in Canada — the W16 suddenly nosedived in form. The culprit? A new rear suspension introduced at Imola that sent handling consistency into chaos. Rookie Andrea Kimi Antonelli struggled most, forcing the team to revert to the old setup by Hungary.

 

 

At that point, Mercedes had already shifted focus to 2026, choosing not to pour resources into further upgrades. Most observers assumed they’d coast to the season’s end. But after the summer break, the W16 was transformed. Across four races — the Netherlands, Italy, Azerbaijan, and Singapore — they bagged 89 points and reclaimed second place in the Constructors’ standings.

So, what happened?

The Mystery of the Front Wing

One clue lies in the TD018 directive, introduced at the Spanish Grand Prix. It tightened the FIA’s tests on front wing flexibility, effectively ending the era of “flappy” aero parts that cleverly bent under aerodynamic load. At least, that was the idea.

But in classic F1 fashion, engineers didn’t stop there. Instead, teams like Mercedes, Red Bull, Aston Martin, and Racing Bulls began experimenting with new materials and designs that legally flexed under dynamic load — a concept some are calling “legal deflection.”

Since the directive, Mercedes has made four iterations to its front wing, while Red Bull has made six. These tweaks are subtle but strategic — aiming to achieve the holy grail of aerodynamic efficiency: low drag on straights and high downforce in corners.

The theory is simple — the front wing “flattens” on straights, slicing through the air, then “bends” slightly in corners to create more grip. It’s the kind of innovation that walks the razor’s edge of legality, and that’s exactly what makes F1 fascinating.

Mercedes insists the idea is “overhyped,” with one engineer telling Auto Motor und Sport that “the rules are clear, and the FIA hasn’t said anything since TD018.” Still, the timing of their resurgence is hard to ignore.

Ferrari’s Wrong Bet

While Mercedes and Red Bull focused on their front wings, Ferrari went the other way. They chose to invest in the rear suspension, debuting a new setup at Spa to improve braking stability and driver confidence. It didn’t work.

 

 

The data showed minimal improvement, and Ferrari’s SF-25 began to stagnate. Since then, Mercedes and Red Bull have overtaken them in raw performance and adaptability. The result? Ferrari’s once-secure second place in the Constructors’ Championship is now under threat.

The Maranello squad reportedly stopped front wing development entirely after Spain, leaving them with a design now outdated compared to their rivals. In the chessboard of F1 innovation, that’s a checkmate in slow motion.

Red Bull’s Quiet Evolution

Red Bull’s situation is equally intriguing. While they haven’t completely recaptured their early-season dominance, the RB21 has quietly evolved. Their six front wing updates since TD018 suggest the team’s aerodynamic department — led by Pierre Waché — has been working overtime to adapt.

 

 

It’s not just about speed; it’s about maintaining aerodynamic balance as regulations tighten and rivals catch up. Red Bull’s upgrades have helped Max Verstappen stay competitive in qualifying, even on circuits that didn’t traditionally suit the team.

While their dominance isn’t as absolute as before, their adaptability remains unmatched.

The Cat-and-Mouse Game Never Ends

The drama surrounding TD018 underscores what makes Formula 1 such a relentless engineering battlefield. Every time the FIA moves the goalposts, the teams find new ways to play within — and sometimes just outside — the lines.

The fight between innovation and regulation is never-ending. Mercedes’s recovery, Red Bull’s flexibility, and Ferrari’s missteps all illustrate how one technical directive can reshuffle the grid mid-season.

As the season enters its final stretch, the big question is whether Mercedes and Red Bull can sustain their newfound magic — or if Ferrari and McLaren can strike back. With six races left, the championship may already be decided, but the development war certainly isn’t.