Canon has recently expanded its RF-mount mirrorless camera lineup with the introduction of the Canon EOS R100, positioned as an entry-level model below the Canon EOS R50. It aims to offer Canon’s renowned image quality at a more affordable price point. However, upon closer inspection, the EOS R100 seems to miss the mark when it comes to meeting the needs of beginners.
Priced at $699 (approx) / £669 / AU$1,099 with the RF-S 18-45mm lens, the EOS R100 is the lowest-cost model in Canon’s mirrorless range. Despite this, its features and design choices raise concerns. While the camera does feature a 24MP APS-C crop sensor, it lacks the advancements found in the EOS R50, making it feel like a stripped-down version of its sibling.
One of the most glaring issues is the design of the EOS R100. Rather than opting for a compact and vlogging-friendly style similar to Canon’s EOS M200, the camera retains a DSLR-style form factor. Additionally, it features a fixed, non-touch-sensitive LCD screen—a questionable choice considering its target audience of beginners who are accustomed to smartphones and touch interfaces.
The EOS R100’s video capabilities also leave much to be desired. It offers 4K video with a 1.55x crop and limited slow-motion capabilities. Compared to the EOS R50, which shoots oversampled 4K video with no crop, the R100’s video features feel outdated and restrictive. Furthermore, the absence of wide-angle 4K video due to electronic stabilization limitations adds to the camera’s video-related shortcomings.
While the EOS R100 benefits from Canon’s latest RF mount, which is the company’s current focus, its feature set remains underwhelming. Continuous shooting is limited to 3.5fps with continuous autofocus, and the autofocus system, although effective, is a basic version compared to Canon’s more advanced offerings. Overall, the camera’s tech closely resembles the EOS M50, a model that is now five years old.
Ultimately, the Canon EOS R100 falls short of being a sensible recommendation for beginners. Its lackluster features, dated video capabilities, and design choices make it a less appealing option compared to other cameras in its price range. Canon’s decision to position the camera as an entry-level choice seems out of touch with the needs and expectations of today’s beginner photographers.
